<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funambol on Mac OS X, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maffulli.net/2008/07/12/funambol-on-mac-os-x-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maffulli.net/2008/07/12/funambol-on-mac-os-x-2/</link>
	<description>about open communities, source of freedom and good software</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stef</title>
		<link>http://maffulli.net/2008/07/12/funambol-on-mac-os-x-2/#comment-32524</link>
		<dc:creator>Stef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maffulli.net/?p=603#comment-32524</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick, Kevin told me that the sync sources are not limited to slow syncs.   The createConfig code should set this to two-way. I think the comment there is a leftover. I hope he will find the time to continue fix bugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick, Kevin told me that the sync sources are not limited to slow syncs.   The createConfig code should set this to two-way. I think the comment there is a leftover. I hope he will find the time to continue fix bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ohly</title>
		<link>http://maffulli.net/2008/07/12/funambol-on-mac-os-x-2/#comment-32522</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ohly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maffulli.net/?p=603#comment-32522</guid>
		<description>Stefano, now that you have tried it, can you confirm that the Funambol Plugin for Mac OS X is currently limited to slow syncs, as I suspected based on its source code (http://www.estamos.de/blog/2008/07/07/syncml-mac-os-x/)?

Kevin said that he intends to continue with bug fixes - any idea whether the lack of full two-way synchronization (if that's the case) is considered a bug and therefore on his list of things to do next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefano, now that you have tried it, can you confirm that the Funambol Plugin for Mac OS X is currently limited to slow syncs, as I suspected based on its source code (http://www.estamos.de/blog/2008/07/07/syncml-mac-os-x/)?</p>
<p>Kevin said that he intends to continue with bug fixes - any idea whether the lack of full two-way synchronization (if that&#8217;s the case) is considered a bug and therefore on his list of things to do next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Funambol on Mac OS X, part 2</title>
		<link>http://maffulli.net/2008/07/12/funambol-on-mac-os-x-2/#comment-32515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Funambol on Mac OS X, part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maffulli.net/?p=603#comment-32515</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Stef [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Stef [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
